Observing a car accident, a train wreck, or any other such accident triggers the human instinct to fight or fly. That’s why we can’t look away from flashing lights on the freeway when tow trucks and emergency vehicles are towing away wrecks and taking care of the wounded. Looking away contradicts programmed behavior. The audience tunes in HBOFour-part mini-series “Allen v. Farrow,” directed by Kirby Dick and Amy ZieringI’m not going to look away either, but not because they are watching a train crash. This metaphor has a very negative impact on the series’ nausea. Rather, they are watching the tragedy of a woman in motion, as recounted from Dylan and Mia Farrow, loved ones, and the authorities and experts who tried your case.
READ MORE: The 65 Most Anticipated TV Shows and Mini-Series of 2021
Absent from this list of names, perhaps unsurprisingly and is right Woody Allen, Dylan’s adoptive father and Soon-yi Previn, Mia Farrow’s adopted daughter and Allen’s wife of 23 years and Moses Farrow, Farrow, and Allen’s adopted son. The lack of their participation is deafening, not least because in 2018 Moses openly described Dylan as a liar and Mia as abusive. Without Allen, who represents himself, the series is called “Allen v. Farrow ”. The miniseries really could be scaled down to “Farrow” and reduced to a two-hour film, and the excess was cut away to give Dylan the stage to which she openly belongs, given the enormous number of names involved in her life and hers terrible ordeal, her name is the only one that counts damn well. (And for the record, if you do Really want to accuse everyone, let him talk. Nobody is a worse Allen lawyer than Allen himself, as evidenced by some of the interview recordings and phone call clips used throughout.)
READ MORE: The 20 Best Documentaries of 2020
It’s part of the cycle of nature that happens every few years, be it through the release of a new Allen movie or through public statements by, for example Ronan FarrowAllen’s crimes against his daughter are brought into the limelight for halfhearted relitigation, as if there was someone left in the world who would require convincing either Allen’s guilt or Farrow’s alleged dishonesty. Given that the latter is unsupported and overwhelming evidence supports the former despite years of suppressive legal maneuvers, “Allen v. Farrow “ends up driving the choir and possibly driving the opposition that stubbornly clings to the idea that everyone is innocent, or if he’s not quite so innocent, who cares? He is Woody Allen! Really if you are a star they let you do that.
READ MORE: The Best Documentaries of the Decade [2010s]
If someone leaves the series with the impression that they have just seen a hit song and is therefore still convinced of Allen’s likelihood, the fault lies directly with them and not with Kirby and Ziering. To see “Allen v. Farrow” means to expose your soul to the worst that humanity has to offer. While the details of Dylan’s abuse are not new per se, listening to it again and contextualizing it with Dylan’s own narrative of her traumatic past gives the narrative a particularly sobering impact, so even if you know what Allen went through still This is the first time you have heard of the abuse. Perhaps that’s what you get when survivors tell their stories: closeness to the power to turn blood to ice in your veins. What Dylan shows the audience by speaking as openly as in “Allen v. Farrow “, is bravery, real Bravery, the bravery that we humans praise in relation to the roles they choose and the accomplishments they give, which is rarely “brave”. It’s artificial. Dylan’s appearances on the miniseries are not artificial and she gives every reason to see them.
READ MORE: The 25 Best Movies of 2020 That You Haven’t Seen
But “Allen v. Farrow “fills her time in front of the camera with mostly well-trodden ground. Remember: this case has been a subject of general interest since the 1990s, and has been heard in court and in public for nearly three decades. At some level, there’s not much we don’t know yet (although it’s fair to hear it all in one place, contextualized, including the fact that Allen Farrow sued Farrow in the middle of the criminal investigation into custody of the children to do so Achieving distraction from the narrative, putting pressure on Farrow, and being vengeful on the allegations can be especially shocking and brutal). And what we don’t actually know is poorly identified by Dick and Ziering, who got their hands on new documentaries, new audio recordings, and new video recordings to back up the allegations against Allen. Perhaps her job would have done better to treat her viewers like idiots by underlining what was previously invisible and unheard than treating their viewers like fools through excruciatingly persistent filmmaking, as if they had to back up Dylan’s report with their own interjections: slow ones Pans around The Farrow Farmhouse in Connecticut or near blocks of town in New York City as if it suggests Allen is lurking around every corner, ready to pounce like the glasses predator that he is.
It is a visual melodrama that borders on moral panic about a man whose reputation as a scary monster is well established and therefore does not require embellishment. Dick and Ziering don’t just present the facts. You also ask the question. Granted, by now no one should think that Allen actually attacked Dylan, and any doubts about it do “Allen v. Farrow” honestly shakes lingering, even if you were his most determined supporter in the past. Also, grant that no doubt requires no emphasis on guilt by melodramatic directing, and that dubious claims should be completely cut off from talking heads: friends of the Farrow family up to and including Carly Simon Discharging insubstantial nonsense that doesn’t add anything to Kirby and Ziering’s investigation and actually undermine it, while professional film critics argue that Allen skewed his entire filmography around age differences in his film novels, only to get his audience to abandon his relationship with Soon-yi tolerate.
Is it wrong and gross and gross that Allen persecuted them? Sure. Is his work’s obsessive fixation on relationships between men in their forties and women in their twenties uncomfortable? at best? Absolutely. Are cultural journalists and members of the Farrows unbiased support system qualified to conduct high-end psychological reading? Not in the least, and if “Allen v. Farrow “casually exudes a chair analysis, diminishing, and undercutting its authority over the material. However, when the series suffers on its own pretext, it is backed up by Dylan’s unwavering testimony. Some people are fine when they don’t know the truth. You are content to look away. “Allen v. Farrow” justifies itself when all one can see is Dylan, but so often (and even humiliated) himself and her through unbearably lousy technology. [C-]