The Russo Brothers & Tom Holland lack MCU magic in their opioid drama [Review]

Tom Holland and Zendaya, different from yours “Spider Man“Roots share one thing in common: They are trying to lose theirs Disney Roots for more mature roles appropriate to their age. For example, Zendaya doesn’t just play a darker role in “euphoria, “But also produced”Malcolm & Marie“And should in”dune. “On the other hand, Holland showed a promise in”The devil all the time“But hasn’t fully demonstrated his ability to take on the same painful roles as Zendaya. Based on Nico WalkerHis novel of the same name, his latest filmcherry, ”Is judged by the Russo Brothers and tells the story of an Ohio teenager who enrolls as a medic only to return home from the Iraq war with PTSD and an opioid habit.

READ MORE: The 100 Most Anticipated Movies of 2021

In the rust belt there is “Cherry” a quantity of the film; Five chapters include war films, a robbery film and a dark romance under the genres. Opening with the teen meeting his high school girlfriend Emily (Ciara Bravo), which then unfold their marriage in a series of chapters, it is a code dependency on Syd and Nancy that is both about drugs and their mutual addiction. The Russo Brothers use the couple’s relationship to tell a story about the opioid crisis that afflicts places like Ohio. But so much of this absurdly dark war drama is too short-sighted to truthfully explain the region’s public health emergency. Rather, the Russo Brothers “cherry” is a serious star vehicle that misses both its star and its story.

READ MORE: The 25 Best Movies of 2020

“Cherry” consists of chapters with incongruent sound, which often confuse rather than explain their central character. And the Russo Brothers over-style almost every minute of their film. From Kirsch’s first meeting with Emily through the eyes of a deer to the final minutes of healing in the drama. The filmmakers use soft lenses, muted colors, sharp color corrections, POV and bird’s eye views, breaks on the fourth wall, and split screens to transition from the innocence of Cherry’s teenage years to the horrors of war. A transition that is difficult to translate.

READ MORE: Tom Holland on Cherry’s challenge and how WandaVision is his favorite Marvel creation [Interview]

The same criticism can be made of the slippery dialogue. When Cherry joins the army, he is inundated by the poisonous masculinity of his fellow soldiers. Drill sergeants routinely threaten to hit him in the crotch. Others say it has a “tail with ears”. It is as if the Russo brothers had “Full metal jacket“When repeated, but never understood how the dialogue in this film worked. What an absurdity R Lee EmeryThe disguises tried to convey how the military is dehumanizing to create combat machines.

LISTEN: Exclusive Cherry Music: Listen to a song from Henry Jackman’s score for the Russo Brothers film

Even when applied to the combat sequences of the Iraq war, the film isn’t as haunting as you’d think, which is strange given that Cherry is a medic. The scenes are actually pretty cold and the carnage seems hollow. Rather than allowing the horrors of the desert war front to manifest visually, the Russo brother insists on using voice over to recount what Cherry sees describing a dying soldier who looks like a “lizard brain” on his face .

READ MORE: Ciara Bravo is ready for the cherry spotlight [Interview]

Almost the entire first lesson is not very well thought out. In fact, one could argue that the picture doesn’t start until Cherry comes home from the war because the rust belt opioid crisis is the real story. While the events leading up to his arrival at home are important, they could be cut off so this drama isn’t that long (it lasts 2.5 hours and feels at least that long).

READ MORE: “Cherry”: The Russo Brothers reveal the first clip of their new crime drama starring Tom Holland

Cherry and Emily’s relationship and how they descend into junkie madness is the only narrative component that works. When Cherry returns to Ohio, he finds Emily, who has a permanent job as a school teacher. On the other hand, he spends most of his nights with PTSD. To deal with this, he treats himself with heroin. To be closer to him, Emily also takes the drug with him. At first glance, their relationship is less Syd than Nancy and more addicting and trader. Emily is just as addicted to Cherry as she is to drugs. But Holland and Bravo show real affection for one another that goes beyond the hazy heights of the film. And they bring a real heart into a relationship that is written on the surface.

However, Holland as a bank robber is on far more shaky ground. To support his and Emily’s drug habit, Cherry decides to become a bank robber and donate his proceeds to his Dudebro dealer Pills and Coke (Jack Reynor). This is another deliberate loss of its nice charm, similar to “The Devil All the Time”. The darker places where a role like Cherry should make Holland feel still out of reach for the MCU star. Cherry is a broken character, but Holland, even if adorned with crusts and junkie sweat, doesn’t wear good brokenness. Rather, he plays it as if he had only read about pain but never felt it.

Outside of Cherry, the film lacks fully realized characters. Supporting players, often black, are either shrouded in shadow or have a weapon in their face. The women are even less viewed. Cherry’s first high school girlfriend, Madison, is embarrassed and never seen on screen again. Even Emily is portrayed as a prize first (literally wearing a bow around her neck) but then descends into addictive junkie madness. Part of it is that Cherry first meets these women when he’s a teen, but he doesn’t get any less myopic as an adult.

In other ways, the Russo brothers are also nearsighted. We never see the opioid crisis causing the rust belt beyond Kirsch’s ridiculous lens. More like cartoons like Black – a dangerous drug dealer – and Pills, a double-collar dude-bro dealer associated with Black, are fancy but never felt. Because this drama stares at all of its characters and uses their plight as fodder for a supposed art. For example, classical music tribes accompany their highs. But the tragic emotion beneath the size doesn’t trickle down to a granular level.

There is a great movie about the opioid crisis. But similar to “Hillbilly elegy, “” Cherry cannot conjure up the cause and toll of the devastation without relying on pastiche, and even the ending, thought of as a moment of healing, reduces Kirsch’s final journey to a mere saccharine montage.

If the Russo brothers are totally interested in the opioid crisis, shouldn’t the aftermath of the addiction gain a foothold like the absurd flashy war sequences or the gaping scenes of drug use? These stories need less Hollywood and a clearer recognition of the real people at the heart of this crisis. As for “Cherry” by the Russo brothers, it doesn’t make it as a war film, as a robbery film or as the star vehicle that it longs so much to be for Holland. It’s just average at its core. [C]