When asked about successful non-comic film franchises, you probably think of “Impossible mission“,”Saw, “or”Jurassic Park. “It would take you a while to get on”The incantation. “After spin-offs like”The nun” and the “Annabelle”Series, the horror universe that began depicting the cases of the real-life investigative couple Ed and Lorraine Warren, has now grossed nearly $ 2 billion worldwide.
READ MORE: Summer 2021 Preview: Over 50 Movies to Watch
Now the Warrens are returning to “The incantation: The devil made me do it. ”A cup of haunted house, a dash of demonic possession and a dash of Satanism make up the brew for the third feature film in this series. Michael Chaves“However, the new horror is nowhere near as scary and narrative exciting as its ingredients suggest. In fact, it’s a flat overcooked dish.
This latest part starts off fascinatingly enough: Ed (Patrick Wilson) and Lorraine (Vera Farmiga) double teaming is a rather extreme case of possession. In fact, it’s the worst they’ve ever seen. In an opening with major recalls to “The exorcist“David Glatzel (Julian Hilliard), a seemingly lovable little boy, cannot shake off the demon in him. Even when a priest comes to exorcise him, David succumbs to a physical horror that distorts his tiny body into hellish shapes. Help comes to David when teenager Arne Johnson (Ruairi O’Connor) ask the demon to take it instead. The flood of events set the table for the real-life incident that inspired the film: Arne’s spirited defense in the 1981 Devil Made Me Do It trial.
READ MORE: “Séance”: Simon Barrett’s directorial debut can’t conjure up anything with life [Review]
Written by David Leslie Johnson-McGoldrick (“The incantation 2 ”), the third part pans into the territory of detective stories. After the dark night with David, Arne feels uncomfortable: he is cold, he hears voices and sees a creepy apparition lurking in the shadows. His hallucinations lead him to brutally murder the boss of his loving friend Debbie (Sarah Catherine Hook). During his murder trial, the Warrens propose a case of demonic possession as the actual perpetrator in his defense. With Arne’s life at stake, the paranormal couple pursues clues that will hopefully save the young man.
The strong thematic ties between mortality and love support this. Ed suffers a massive, near-fatal heart attack that not only limits his skills, but also puts Lorraine at the top. Your character strikes an odd balance in this story. Johnson-McGoldrick wants to demonstrate Lorraines strengths apart from her husband: Before inspecting a creepy crawl space, Ed warns that she is ruining her dress, whereupon she gives a sly grin. On several occasions, however – in the morgue, in the woods, and in a secluded shack owned by John Noble– Lorraine needs her husband to save her. It is a strange contradiction that Chaves is unable to completely smooth out.
READ MORE: ‘Panic’: Amazon’s YA drama is a pulpy summer series with a lot of dangerous escapism [Review]
While “The Conjuring” films operate under the assumption of the Warrens as truth-tellers (more on that later), their love was never questioned. In fact, it has always been the strongest element of this franchise. Johnson-McGoldrick and Chaves explain how the couple first met in sequences that are weird but work well in the safe hands of Wilson and Farmiga. The romance of Arne and Debbie runs parallel to the fairytale love story of the Warrens, which does not convey nearly the same holiness. They exist more as an afterthought, totems of young love in the face of our familiar, figured heroes.
The horrors in this “conjuring up” are out of the mill because the film lacks the technical and narrative skills to generate real shock shocks. The body horror is not particularly gruesome: the crunch of the cracking bones hardly makes an audible dent. While the pretzel-shaped body positions rise just above the internet food. In Arne’s obsessional scenes, the necessary atmosphere of premonition is lacking: it’s one thing when a character says they feel cold, another when the audience feels it too. Rather, O’Connor’s performance is full of characterizations on the surface, obvious decisions on his part that bring us hard into Arne’s psychological turmoil.
The aspect of Satanism is also lacking in fear because the mystery is so solvable, the emotional argument is so thinly sketched. The whole process carries an all too inevitable atmosphere. To the point where the dramatically lazy specter of Ed’s declining health and Lorraine’s contradicting invulnerable vulnerability makes the final showdown in a common satanic hiding place, hu-hum. The entire film makes you want less research and more investment in the contours of the occult premise.
Even the ending will keep the audience clawing for something more. There’s a mid-credit interview with the ’80s Warrens that presents a moral dilemma: the interviewer asks what the danger would be if others used the same defense of demonic possession. Wouldn’t such a legal argument pose a permanent threat to the criminal justice system? It is a grave mistake to point out the moral failures of your film in the closing minutes. But Chaves does. You see, the supporters of “The Conjuring” would never put that intellectual incongruence into the central script. That would require these films to introspectively inspect the Warrens, rather than serving as their myth-building agents, in order to make doubt the central conceit rather than wholeheartedly believing. It would also mean the end of the franchise.
But instead of making the more interesting movie, Chaves and Johnson-McGoldrick kick the can towards the next moneymaking sequel. Which would be totally welcome if “The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It” wasn’t so artistically lazy and oh so boring. [D+]
The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do It hits theaters June 4th and on HBO Max.